Task-orientated visual satisfaction evaluation could help lens design selection

Article

Using a task-orientated visual satisfaction evaluation has potential to help in lens design selection and predicting wearing success.

Using a task-orientated visual satisfaction evaluation has potential to help in lens design selection and predicting wearing success, according to a paper in Journal of Optometry.

Dr Joan Gispets et al., University Vision Centre, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain, completed a longitudinal prospective, cross-over, double-masked study on 22 presbyopic patients were randomly and alternatively fitted with two types of multifocal lenses.

The patients followed two 14-day trial periods, after which overall satisfaction was evaluated. The wearing success of the lens was assessed via the percentage of subjects choosing to continue wearing a multifocal lens and by the total number of subjects continuing to wear the lenses six months later. Habitual tasks were identified by observation distance, visual demand level and time allocation.

Visual satisfaction was affected by viewing distance and visual demand level. It decreased when tasks required higher visual demands involving near and far distance vision, compared to intermediate vision or a combination of near and far vision. It was found that the main reason for patient discontinuation of multifocal lenses was due to insufficient quality of vision.

Finally, 78% of the patients included in the study chose to continue wearing the lenses, with 1 patient deciding to wear them daily 6 months after study completion. The investigation suggests that a task-orientated visual satisfaction evaluation could be beneficial towards the design selection of a patient's lens and the determination of wearing success.

Newsletter

Join ophthalmologists across Europe—sign up for exclusive updates and innovations in surgical techniques and clinical care.

Recent Videos
At the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons annual meeting, Sheng Lim, MD, FRCOphth discusses the benefit of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for patients with primary open angle glaucoma and cataracts in the CONCEPT study
A photo of Seville, Spain, with the Congress on Controversies in Ophthalmology logo superimposed on it. Image credit: ©francovolpato – stock.adobe.com; logo courtesy COPHy
Anat Loewenstein, MD, Professor and Director, Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, discusses the Congress on Controversies in Ophthalmology (COPHy)
Anat Loewenstein, MD, speaks about the 22nd Annual Angiogenesis, Exudation, and Degeneration Meeting in February 2025 and shares her global forecast for AI-driven home OCT
Sarah M. Thomasy, DVM, PhD, DACVO, a veterinary ophthalmologist at UC Davis, talks about how her research at the Glaucoma 360 symposium
I. Paul Singh, MD, an anterior segment and glaucoma specialist, discusses the Glaucoma 360 conference, where he participated in a panel discussion on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in glaucoma care.
Charles Wykoff, MD, PhD, discusses his Floretina ICOOR presentation topic, retinal non-perfusion in diabetic retinopathy, with David Hutton, editor of Ophthalmology Times
Elizabeth Cohen, MD, discusses the Zoster Eye Disease study at the 2024 AAO meeting
Victoria L Tseng, MD, PhD, professor of ophthalmology and glaucoma specialist, UCLA
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.