Scleral spacing procedure and its indications in glaucoma treatment


Dr Soloway discusses a novel approach for treating glaucoma known as the scleral spacing procedure (SSP) using PresView Scleral Implants

One of the reasons surgical control of glaucoma has been advocated by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, with the publication of their preferred practice pattern treatment guidelines since 2003, is because of the non-compliance issues. The penetrating trabeculectomy - with or without the use of anti-metabolites - is used as the 'gold standard' to measure all glaucoma surgical procedures against. The problems of this intraocular filtering procedure have long been known, including hypotony, scarring and failure of the bleb, bleb leakage and infection. Numerous other alternatives are now available or in the pipeline and attempting to ameliorate these issues, but all continue to have the same problems of any penetrating procedure aimed at controlling the outflow of aqueous over the long-term. Each has its own 'Goldilocks' approach, of not enough filtration or too much in an effort to reach just the right amount of filtration.

We have found a novel approach to the treatment of glaucoma known as the scleral spacing procedure (SSP) using PresView Scleral Implants (PSI, Refocus-Group, Dallas, Texas, USA). These implants are being studied as a treatment for presbyopia in an FDA monitored investigational device exemption (IDE) clinical trial currently underway in the US. During the initial phase of that study, it was found that the implants also appeared to have an IOP lowering effect on the normotensive presbyopic emmetropes in whom they were implanted. Although not clinically significant in this group of patients without glaucoma, a statistically significant reduction in IOP of approximately 20% was found in patients with baseline IOP of ?16 mmHg. Our interpretation of these results - and the similarity in age of onset for presbyopia and POAG - led to an interest in conducting a study regarding the use of SSP for early POAG and OHT patients as an alternative to medical and or penetrating surgical treatment. By removing patient compliance issues, side effects of medication usage, risk of hypotony, and variability of penetrating surgery, the SSP may become a first line treatment in glaucoma care.

Recent Videos
ASRS 2024: Michael Singer, MD, shares 100-week results from the RESTORE trial
Paulo Antonio Silva, Associate Professor of Ophthalmology at Harvard Medical School
Intraocular Pressure Outcomes Following Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone Acetonide in Patients With Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension, or Steroid Response
Durga Borkar, MD, MMCi, discusses FAS inhibition with ONL-1204
Theodore Leng, MD, MS, speaks about 12-Month Real-World Clinical and Anatomical Outcomes With Faricimab in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema:The FARETINA-DME Study
Rishi P. Singh, MD, discussed his presentation on the results from part 1 of the Phase 2/3 SIGLEC trial assessing AVD-104 for GA
Carl C. Awh, MD, FASRS, speaks with Hattie Hayes of Ophthalmology Times Europe
Carl J. Danzig, MD
Martin Zinkernagel, MD, PhD, speaks about the ASRS sustainability expert panel
Srinivas Sai Kondapalli, MD, discusses outer retinal tubulations in lesion growth for subfoveal and non-subfoveal GA
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.