LADAR 6000: good but time consuming

Article

Although the LADAR 6000 (Alcon) is accurate and safe, the need for pharmacological mydriasis and the use of a nomogram result in a more time consuming surgical procedure.

Although the LADAR 6000 (Alcon) is accurate and safe, the need for pharmacological mydriasis and the use of a nomogram result in a more time consuming surgical procedure, according to Joaquim Murta and colleagues from Coimbra University, Portugal.

A total of 300 consecutive eyes underwent refractive surgery with the LADAR 6000. Of those, 245 were submitted to photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct a manifest spheroequivalent refractive error (MSRE) of -5.5+4.3 D, with a cylinder ranging from -4.50 to +3.50 D. Fifty-five eyes were submitted to LASIK using the Zyoptix XP microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb) to correct MSRE of -0.75 to -9.29 with a cylinder ranging from 0.00 to -5.50 D.

Following PRK, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.9, best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 1.0 and MSRE was 0.00. The eyes which underwent LASIK reached a UCVA of 0.7, a BSCVA of 0.9 and a MSRE of 0.4. Just one eye lost two lines of BSCVA due to adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis.

Dr Murta concluded that the LADAR 6000 offers good results but is a time consuming procedure.

Related Videos
Ramin Tadayoni, MD, speaks with Sheryl Stevenson
Jennifer I. Lim, MD, FARVO, FASRS, Director of Retina Service, University of Illinois at Chicago
Anat Loewenstein, MD, Professor and Director, Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center
Carl D. Regillo, MD, FACS, FASRS, Chief of Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
Arshad Khanani, MD, MA FASRS, on a virtual call
Penny A Asbell, MD, FACS speaks at the 2023 AAO meeting
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.