Improving IOL power calculations

Article

By using calibrated axial length readings obtained with partial optical coherence interferometry (PCI) and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas incorporating anterior chamber depth (ACD) prediction algorithms, the accuracy of power calculations can be greatly improved, according to study published in the February issue of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavia.

By using calibrated axial length readings obtained with partial optical coherence interferometry (PCI) and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas incorporating anterior chamber depth (ACD) prediction algorithms, the accuracy of power calculations can be greatly improved, according to study published in the February issue of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavia.

Thomas Olsen from the University Eye Clinic, Aarhus Kommunehospital, Aarhus, Denmark, calculated the IOL power for 461 consecutive cataract patients using both PCI and ultrasound. The accuracy of the results from each technique were compared. Predictions were calculated using both a recently published 5–variable method and the Haigis 2–variable method. All calculations were optimized in retrospect to account for systematic errors, including IOL constants and other off–set errors.

The average absolute IOL prediction error (observed minus expected refraction) was 0.65 D with ultrasound and 0.43 D with PCI using 5–variable ACD prediction method (p‹0.00001). The number of predictions within ±0.5 D, ±1.0 D and ±2.0 D of the expected outcome was 62.5%, 92.4% and 99.9% with PCI, compared with 45.5%, 77.3% and 98.4% with ultrasound (p‹0.00001), respectively. The 2–variable ACD method resulted in an average error in PCI prediction of 0.46 D, which was found to be significantly higher than the 5–variable method (p‹0.001).

Olsen concluded that the accuracy of IOL power calculations is significantly improved when using PCI and modern calculation formulas that incorporate the latest generation ACD prediction algorithms.

Recent Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times Europe) AGS 2025: Clemens Strohmaier, PhD, on improving aqueous humour outflow following excimer laser trabeculostomy
3 experts are featured in this series.
Anat Loewenstein, MD, speaks about the 22nd Annual Angiogenesis, Exudation, and Degeneration Meeting in February 2025 and shares her global forecast for AI-driven home OCT
3 experts are featured in this series.
3 experts are featured in this series.
Sarah M. Thomasy, DVM, PhD, DACVO, a veterinary ophthalmologist at UC Davis, talks about how her research at the Glaucoma 360 symposium
I. Paul Singh, MD, an anterior segment and glaucoma specialist, discusses the Glaucoma 360 conference, where he participated in a panel discussion on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in glaucoma care.
Sunita Radhakrishnan, MD, an associate at the Glaucoma Center of San Francisco, speaks at the annual Glaucoma 360 meeting about electrical neurostimulation.
3 experts are featured in this series.
3 experts are featured in this series.
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.