What's the best way to detect glaucoma?

Article

GDx variable cornea compensation with scanning laser polarimetry (SLP-VCC), Heidelberg retina tomography (HRT) confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) and stereoscopic optic nerve head (ONH) photographs may all be useful in assisting clinicians to diagnose glaucoma.

GDx variable cornea compensation with scanning laser polarimetry (SLP-VCC), Heidelberg retina tomography (HRT) confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) and stereoscopic optic nerve head (ONH) photographs may all be useful in assisting clinicians to diagnose glaucoma, according to a report published in the March issue of the British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Nicolaas Reus, Maartje de Graaf and Hans Lemij from the Rotterdam Eye Hospital, The Netherlands, enrolled 40 healthy subjects, 48 patients with glaucoma and six patients with ocular hypertension. Measurements were taken of one eye from each subject using SLP-VCC and CSLO. Simultaneous stereoscopic ONH photographs were also obtained. Sixteen photographs of healthy and glaucomatous eyes were duplicated for assessing intra-observer agreement. For SLP-VCC, the nerve fibre indicator (NFI) was evaluated and for CSLO the Moorfields regression analysis (MRA) and the Bathija linear discriminant function (LDF) were used. Four glaucoma specialists, four general ophthalmologists, four ophthalmic residents and four optometrists classified the ONH photographs as either normal or glaucomatous.

The researchers found that SLP-VCC had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with a sensitivity, specificity and overall correct classification of 91.7%, 95% and 93.2% respectively. CSLO, expressed as Bathija LDF and MRA, had a diagnostic accuracy comparable to glaucoma specialists and general ophthalmologists with an overall accuracy of 89.8%, 86.4%, 86.7% and 85.2%, respectively. Residents classified the fewest eyes correctly.

Intra-observer agreement for classifying the ONH photographs ranged between 0.48 (within residents) and 0.78 (within glaucoma specialists). The agreement between observers and CSLO MRA (0.68) was statistically significantly higher (p<0.001) than between observers and SLP-VCC NFI (0.60) and CSLO Bathija LDF (0.62).

The authors agree that use of these imaging techniques may help clinicians in diagnosing glaucoma.

Recent Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times Europe) AGS 2025: Clemens Strohmaier, PhD, on improving aqueous humour outflow following excimer laser trabeculostomy
Anat Loewenstein, MD, speaks about the 22nd Annual Angiogenesis, Exudation, and Degeneration Meeting in February 2025 and shares her global forecast for AI-driven home OCT
Sarah M. Thomasy, DVM, PhD, DACVO, a veterinary ophthalmologist at UC Davis, talks about how her research at the Glaucoma 360 symposium
I. Paul Singh, MD, an anterior segment and glaucoma specialist, discusses the Glaucoma 360 conference, where he participated in a panel discussion on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in glaucoma care.
Charles Wykoff, MD, PhD, discusses his Floretina ICOOR presentation topic, retinal non-perfusion in diabetic retinopathy, with David Hutton, editor of Ophthalmology Times
Elizabeth Cohen, MD, discusses the Zoster Eye Disease study at the 2024 AAO meeting
Vikas Chopra at AAO 2024: Advancements in MIGS are transforming patient care
Victoria L Tseng, MD, PhD, professor of ophthalmology and glaucoma specialist, UCLA
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.