Syringe-based portable vitrectomy device is safe for vitreoretinal diseases

Article

The Intrector syringe-based vitrectomy device has similar comfortable sustainable syringe pull forces, vacuum levels and liquid aspiration rates as commercially available systems.

The Intrector syringe-based vitrectomy device has similar comfortable sustainable syringe pull forces, vacuum levels and liquid aspiration rates as commercially available systems, states an experiment published in Retina.

Dr John Pitcher et al., Jules Stein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA, compared the fluidic properties of the Intrector device with a number of other commercially available vitrectomy systems. The study was compiled in order to assess the safety and efficacy for the treatment of vitreoretinal diseases.

A spring-loaded digital scale was used to measure the mean operator comfortable sustainable syringe plunger pull force. A pressure transducer was used to record pulling forces and vacuum levels for syringes of varying volumes. This included volumes in measurements of 3, 5 and 10 ml. A cutter with a rate of 600 cuts per minute was used to determine the flow rates of water and egg whites. These were measured in the off position with the port open. The infusion flow of water was measured using a 1 ml syringe.

The mean vacuum level was 135.9 mm Hg when using the 3 ml syringe with a 0.91 kg pull force. Additionally, the mean cutter-on flow rates of egg white and water were 0.5 ml per minute and 1.9 ml per minute, respectively. The mean plunger pull force among operators was recorded as 0.80 kg.

Overall, larger-bore syringes generated lower vacuum levels and liquid flow rates. The fluidic parameters of the Intrector vitrectomy device indicate similar syringe pull forces, vacuum levels and liquid aspiration rates to commercially available devices.

Newsletter

Join ophthalmologists across Europe—sign up for exclusive updates and innovations in surgical techniques and clinical care.

Recent Videos
At the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons annual meeting, Sheng Lim, MD, FRCOphth discusses the benefit of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for patients with primary open angle glaucoma and cataracts in the CONCEPT study
A photo of Seville, Spain, with the Congress on Controversies in Ophthalmology logo superimposed on it. Image credit: ©francovolpato – stock.adobe.com; logo courtesy COPHy
Anat Loewenstein, MD, Professor and Director, Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, discusses the Congress on Controversies in Ophthalmology (COPHy)
Anat Loewenstein, MD, speaks about the 22nd Annual Angiogenesis, Exudation, and Degeneration Meeting in February 2025 and shares her global forecast for AI-driven home OCT
Sarah M. Thomasy, DVM, PhD, DACVO, a veterinary ophthalmologist at UC Davis, talks about how her research at the Glaucoma 360 symposium
I. Paul Singh, MD, an anterior segment and glaucoma specialist, discusses the Glaucoma 360 conference, where he participated in a panel discussion on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in glaucoma care.
Charles Wykoff, MD, PhD, discusses his Floretina ICOOR presentation topic, retinal non-perfusion in diabetic retinopathy, with David Hutton, editor of Ophthalmology Times
Elizabeth Cohen, MD, discusses the Zoster Eye Disease study at the 2024 AAO meeting
Victoria L Tseng, MD, PhD, professor of ophthalmology and glaucoma specialist, UCLA
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.