Incidence of dry eye after refractive procedures


A comparison of self-reported dry eye symptoms after LASIK or PRK

According to Dr Edward E. Manche (Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA), "There is more vision fluctuation in photorefractive keratometry (PRK) compared to laser assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the early postoperative period because of epithelial remodelling." This was revealed in his recent study comparing postop signs and symptoms of dry eye, dry eye severity, foreign body sensation and vision fluctuations in myopic patients undergoing PRK and LASIK.

"There was some anecdotal evidence that PRK surgery might produce a lower incidence of dry eye compared to LASIK surgery. I think it is important for us to get a better understanding of the incidence of dry eye and whether or not there are any advantages of one keratorefractive procedure versus another," he said.

Delivering precise results

The questionnaire has been used in previous contralateral eye assessments and was completed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Questions included: "Do you have problems with dry eyes?" and "If you do have problems with dry eyes, how severe is this problem?" Patients were also asked to grade the severity of halos, rings or starbursts of light.

Dr Manche is forward thinking in his approach to the differences in self-reported dry eye symptoms in LASIK and PRK patients. While some believe there are differences between the surgical techniques, Dr Manche explained, "It was always my clinical impression that there were no substantive differences between selfreported dry eye symptoms and severity in my patients undergoing LASIK and PRK surgery. Therefore, I was not surprised by the results of the study."

After one month the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectaclecorrected visual acuity (BSCVA), 5% and 25% contrast sensitivity, induction of higher-order aberrations (HOAs), subjective symptoms of vision clarity, vision fluctuation and general selfassessment of vision were all worse in the PRK eyes. However, by three months the differences between the PRK and LASIK eyes were resolved. "All of the epithelial layers have been replaced by one month in most patients following PRK surgery," Dr Manche stated. "There is often a visible epithelial fusion line on slit lamp exam in the early postoperative period. The irregular central epithelium often creates central irregularity that is visualized on computerized videokeratography. These epithelial changes resolve in the majority of cases by the three month postoperative examination. This is the cause of the vision fluctuations in PRK surgery."

After one year mean spherical equivalent was reduced by 94% to –0.27 ± 0.31 D in the LASIK group. In the PRK group it was reduced by 96% to –0.17 ± 0.41 D. In the LASIK group 91% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 97% were within ±1.0 D in the PRK group. Apart from the first postoperative month where LASIK was more effective, both LASIK and PRK are equally safe and effective in reducing myopia in the long run.

Bigger sample sizes

Although there were not many factors that could have affected the results, Dr Manche claims he would have preferred to increase the amount of patients in the study. "One of the limitations of our study was the relatively small sample size. I found that recruiting patients for this type of study was more difficult than usual for other studies such as my original dry eye study in patients undergoing LASIK with a mechanical keratome in one eye and a femtosecond laser in their fellow eye. I would like to see additional larger multicentre studies to validate our findings," he continued. "Another limitation of our study was that we only looked at self-reported symptoms of dry eye. It would be useful in future studies to gather and analyse physical findings including Schirmer testing, corneal staining with vital dyes, corneal sensation and tear break-up time."

Dr Manche revealed that he is working on a number of studies to assess the factors effecting the incidence of dry eye. "This is an important area of research. I have one ongoing study comparing two femtosecond lasers used in LASIK surgery for flap creation," he said. "We are looking at self-reported dry eye findings as well as objective finding such as corneal sensation between the two groups. We plan to present the findings of these studies in some upcoming scientific meetings."


Both LASIK and PRK cause an increase in the signs and symptoms of dry eye and dry eye severity, however, in the early post-op stages PRK eyes experience larger fluctuations in vision. "I don't believe that we should advise patients with symptomatic dry eye to have PRK over LASIK. If you feel that a patient is not a candidate for LASIK due to dry eye, then I don't think that the patient is a candidate for PRK," concluded Dr Manche.

Related Videos
Ramin Tadayoni, MD, speaks with Sheryl Stevenson
Jennifer I. Lim, MD, FARVO, FASRS, Director of Retina Service, University of Illinois at Chicago
Anat Loewenstein, MD, Professor and Director, Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center
Carl D. Regillo, MD, FACS, FASRS, Chief of Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
Arshad Khanani, MD, MA FASRS, on a virtual call
At this year's ESCRS meeting, we asked presenters and attendees, 'What do yoou wish you'd known earlier in your ophthalmology career?'
Diana Do, MD, Professor of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, discusses the PHOTON study results as presented AAO
Penny A Asbell, MD, FACS speaks at the 2023 AAO meeting
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.