Impact of epithelial irregularities on custom wavefront- and topography-guided ablation


Stromal surface irregularities give rise to compensatory epithelial thickness remodelling

"Topography-guided treatments are only useful in cases where the epithelium irregularity is regular," said Professor Dan Z. Reinstein (London Vision Clinic, London, UK) when discussing his study results during his presentation at the annual ESCRS meeting in Vienna, Austria. With his colleagues, Mr Timothy Archer and Dr Marine Gobbe, Prof. Reinstein investigated the impact that irregular epithelial thickness profiles have on topography- or wavefrontguided custom repair of refractive surgery complications.

Irregular irregularities

Using Artemis (ArcScan Inc.) very highfrequency digital ultrasound scans, Prof. Reinstein and colleagues measured the individual corneal layers in a series of eyes, which all had irregularly irregular astigmatism after undergoing corneal refractive surgery. As it is known that the epithelium will try to remodel itself to smooth the corneal front surface, the epithelial thickness profile was used as a surrogate for the stromal surface shape and irregularity. The epithelial thickness profile was subtracted from the corneal front surface elevation to calculate the stromal surface elevation, from which the actual stromal surface topography could be derived.

Prof. Reinstein went on to explain that if you do not take the stromal surface into consideration then an irregularity will remain. "Until you take into account the stromal surface shape and not the corneal front surface topographic shape, we will never achieve the most effective repair tools," he continued. "These epithelial thickness profile changes can also apply to cataract surgery IOL calculations post-LASIK because the epithelial power will be different depending on the procedure that has been performed; the epithelium will sit on the stromal surface as a positive lenticule after a myopic ablation whereas after hyperopic ablation there will be a negative epithelial lenticule covering the stromal surface. Two postop myopic LASIK and hyperopic LASIK eyes may have exactly the same K's, but completely different gradient optics: the epithelial power being the major differentiating factor. I am convinced that gradient optics through the epithelial-stromal interface is the missing link to achieving the most accurate IOL power calculations after corneal refractive surgery. None of the current methods of increasing sophistication, such as raytracing through the cornea can address this epithelial power inaccuracy as they all only take into account the front and back surface shape of the cornea."

Case studies

Related Videos
ARVO 2024: Andrew D. Pucker, OD, PhD on measuring meibomian gland morphology with increased accuracy
 Allen Ho, MD, presented a paper on the 12 month results of a mutation agnostic optogenetic programme for patients with severe vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa
Noel Brennan, MScOptom, PhD, a clinical research fellow at Johnson and Johnson
ARVO 2024: President-elect SriniVas Sadda, MD, speaks with David Hutton of Ophthalmology Times
Elias Kahan, MD, a clinical research fellow and incoming PGY1 resident at NYU
Neda Gioia, OD, sat down to discuss a poster from this year's ARVO meeting held in Seattle, Washington
Eric Donnenfeld, MD, a corneal, cataract and refractive surgeon at Ophthalmic Consultants of Connecticut, discusses his ARVO presentation with Ophthalmology Times
John D Sheppard, MD, MSc, FACs, speaks with David Hutton of Ophthalmology Times
Paul Kayne, PhD, on assessing melanocortin receptors in the ocular space
Osamah Saeedi, MD, MS, at ARVO 2024
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.