FA and OCT work best in combination

Although fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are both effective ways to detect macular oedema (ME), when used in isolation they may miss subtle manifestations of the condition, according to a study published in the April 2008 issue of Retina.

Although fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are both effective ways to detect macular oedema (ME), when used in isolation they may miss subtle manifestations of the condition, according to a study published in the April 2008 issue of Retina.

Igor Kozák, MD of the Jacobs Retina Center, University of California San Diego, US and colleagues conducted a 12-month retrospective single-centre study of 1272 eyes undergoing simultaneous FA and OCT to diagnose ME.

The team found that, in 94.97% of cases (n=1208), a diagnosis of ME was confirmed by both techniques. In 3.86% of cases (n=49), FA indicated ME while OCT indicated a normal result; OCT indicated ME where FA indicated normal results in 1.17% of eyes (n=15).

Thus the researchers concluded that FA and OCT, whilst both highly sensitive and effective techniques, have a very small percentage of discrepancies when detecting ME.

Related Videos
Fluid dynamics in wet macular degeneration: How fluid type affects visual acuity
EURETINA leadership discusses what to expect at the 2022 Congress, outlines Women in Retina programme
Paediatric eyes repair better with scleral buckling, adults need vitrectomy only for giant retinal tear-related detachments
Related Content
© 2023 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.