Comparing GAT with DCT

Article

Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) do not produce identical results when measuring intraocular pressure (IOP), according to study results published in the September 2008 issue of the Journal of Glaucoma.

Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) do not produce identical results when measuring intraocular pressure (IOP), according to study results published in the September 2008 issue of the Journal of Glaucoma.

Michele Lanza, MD of the Department of Ophthalmology at the Second University of Naples, Italy and colleagues used DCT and then, ten minutes later, GAT to assess subjects aged 20–77 years who showed no signs of glaucoma (n=118) and compared the results.

As measured with GAT, the median IOP value was 15.49±2.43 mmHg (range: 11–22 mmHg); when measured with DCT, the median value was 17.59±2.9 mmHg (range: 10.5–25.1 mmHg).

As the median IOP value was statistically significantly higher when measured with DCT when compared with GAT measurements, the researchers concluded that it is not advisable to interchange these instruments and that, when measured with DCT, higher apparent IOP values may in fact be within the normal range.

Newsletter

Get the essential updates shaping the future of pharma manufacturing and compliance—subscribe today to Pharmaceutical Technology and never miss a breakthrough.

Recent Videos
Jay Chhablani, MD, shares late-breaking data from the ArMaDa trial, investigating gene therapy for Geographic Atrophy and dry age-related macular degeneration, at EURETINA
Editorial advisory board member Alexandra Miere, MD, PhD, speaks about the ACTOR and HERMES studies at the 2025 European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA) Congress
María Berrocal, MD, speaks about the Vit-Buckle Society symposium hosted at the 2025 European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA) annual meeting
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.