Autorefractometry is less accurate in LASIK eyes

Article

It has been demonstrated that autorefractometry is less accurate in eyes that have undergone LASIK when compared with non-operated eyes, according to a recent study published in the American Journal of Ophthalmology.

It has been demonstrated that autorefractometry is less accurate in eyes that have undergone LASIK when compared with non-operated eyes, according to a recent study published in the American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Led by Thomas Kohnen et al., Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Centre of J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany, the researchers examined the factors influencing the reliability of autorefractometry before and after LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism.

The study group comprised a total of 250 consecutive eyes belonging to 132 patients with an average preoperative spherical equivalent of the subjective refraction (SR) of -6.59 D. All patient data was reviewed before LASIK and 1 month afterwards, including SR, objective automated reaction (AR) and visual acuity.

Additionally, subgroup analysis was performed with regards to preoperative myopia and excimer laser optical zone (OZ).

The mean post-LASIK spherical equivalent difference was +0.13±0.51 D in comparison with a preoperative difference in spherical equivalent of –0.30±0.58 D. The respective postoperative difference between spherical equivalents by optical zone size were as follows: for small OZ (5.0–5.5 mm) = –0.61 D; for OZ 5.6–6.0 mm = –0.36 D; and for 6.1–7.0 mm = –0.16 D. Further, the higher the preoperative myopia, the increasingly myopic the AR when compared with the SR.

Based on the results, the authors concluded that the reliability of automated refraction is lowered following LASIK and this is influenced by the excimer laser optical zone size and the preoperative myopia. Specifically, refraction was less accurate with a small OZ and high preoperative myopia.

Newsletter

Join ophthalmologists across Europe—sign up for exclusive updates and innovations in surgical techniques and clinical care.

Recent Videos
Christine Curcio, PhD, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, shares histology update and revised nomenclature for OCT with Sheryl Stevenson of the Eye Care Network and Ophthalmology Times
SriniVas R. Sadda, MD, FARVO, shares key points from his retina presentation at the International SPECTRALIS Symposium
Robert Sergott, MD, describes fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy (FLIO) and the International SPECTRALIS Symposium – And Beyond (ISS) in Heidelberg, Germany.
Rayaz Malik, MBChB, PhD, a professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine - Qatar, spoke with Ophthalmology Times Europe about his presentation. It's titled "An eye on neurodegenerative diseases: Challenging the dogma" at the International SPECTRALIS Sympsoium. In conversation with Hattie Hayes, Ophthalmology Times Europe
Anat Loewenstein, MD, describes her presentation on remote imaging for age-related macular degeneration and geographic atrophy at the International SPECTRALIS Symposium, in conversation with Hattie Hayes of Ophthalmology Times Europe
Tyson Brunstetter, OD, PhD, a US Navy Aerospace Optometrist at the NASA Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, shares key takeaways from his keynote at the International SPECTRALIS Symposium (ISS)
Rayaz Malik, MBChB, PhD, shares his presentation, titled An eye on neurodegenerative diseases: Challenging the dogma, at this year's International SPECTRALIS Symposium
At the Retina World Congress, Siegfried Priglinger, MD, speaks about ensuring the best outcomes for preschool-aged patients
At the 2025 ASCRS meeting, Robert Ang, MD said small aperture IOLs can benefit all patients, especially those with complex corneas or who have undergone previous corneal refractive surgery
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.