AAO 2023: research demonstrates AI chatbots produce inaccurate responses to eye health queries

News
Article

In a study presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting, researchers asked practicing ophthalmologists to compare the ability of ChatGPT, Google Bard and Bing Chat in answering common patient questions

A person looks at a computer screen, and the digital screen is reflected in their glasses. Image credit: ©Gorodenkoff – stock.adobe.com

The AI-generated responses included inaccurate information and displayed significant bias against female ophthalmologists. Image credit: ©Gorodenkoff – stock.adobe.com

As artificial intelligence (AI) tools become a larger part of everyday life, it is important for the public to keep in mind that AI-generated results may not be accurate. Ophthalmologists reviewed the results generated by the most popular generative AI programmes. When asked to provide an educational resource for patients with eye conditions and diseases, they found that most responses from the 3 tools evaluated were inaccurate. In fact, 2 of the 3 chatbots also demonstrated a significant bias against female ophthalmologists.1

In the study presented at the 127th annual meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology in San Francisco, researchers from the University of Southern California asked 3 practicing ophthalmologists to compare the ability of 3 programmes, ChatGPT, Google Bard and Bing Chat, to answer common patient questions and create educational resources, as well as recommend ophthalmologists practicing in the 20 largest cities in the US. Each ophthalmologist evaluated the information for comparison on a scale of 1 to 4.1

Google Bard scored the highest for quality and accuracy of responses to patient questions, with an average rating of 2.3 out of 4. ChatGPT had the highest rating for patient educational resources, 3 out of 4.1

All 3 chatbots struggled when asked to recommend practicing ophthalmologists or to accurately locate ophthalmologists in or near a specific city. Google Bard and Bing Chat recommended female ophthalmologists less than 2 percent of the time, even though 27% of the nation’s ophthalmologists are women, showing a significant bias.1

Researcher Michael Oca, BS of the University of California, San Diego, noted that in their current state, AI chatbots may delay a patient receiving key care. He said, “Given the substantial bias and inaccuracy demonstrated in this study, we warn against reliance on AI chatbots when seeking health-related information until improvements in algorithms are achieved and validated in the future. A poor recommendation from a chatbot could further delay a patient’s treatment.”1

Senior author Sandy Zhang-Nunes, MD, associate professor of clinical ophthalmology and director of oculofacial plastic surgery at the University of Southern California, shared that it is important to stress that these AI chatbots do not replace the care of an ophthalmologist: “Relying on online tools for quick advice may be tempting, but we urge the public to remember that this is not a replacement for a comprehensive eye exam with an ophthalmologist. Seeing a medical doctor for preventative exams and examining any sudden change in vision is the best way to protect your eye health.”

For accurate, ophthalmologist-vetted information online, the Academy offers www.EyeSmart.org as a public resource.

Reference:
1. Beware of Dr. Chatbot: Generative AI Often Gives Unreliable, Biased Medical Advice. American Academy of Ophthalmology. November 3, 2023. Accessed November 6, 2023. https://www.aao.org/newsroom/news-releases/detail/beware-of-dr-chatbot-generative-ai-advice

Newsletter

Join ophthalmologists across Europe—sign up for exclusive updates and innovations in surgical techniques and clinical care.

Recent Videos
Christine Curcio, PhD, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, shares histology update and revised nomenclature for OCT with Sheryl Stevenson of the Eye Care Network and Ophthalmology Times
SriniVas R. Sadda, MD, FARVO, shares key points from his retina presentation at the International SPECTRALIS Symposium
Robert Sergott, MD, describes fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy (FLIO) and the International SPECTRALIS Symposium – And Beyond (ISS) in Heidelberg, Germany.
Rayaz Malik, MBChB, PhD, a professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine - Qatar, spoke with Ophthalmology Times Europe about his presentation. It's titled "An eye on neurodegenerative diseases: Challenging the dogma" at the International SPECTRALIS Sympsoium. In conversation with Hattie Hayes, Ophthalmology Times Europe
Anat Loewenstein, MD, describes her presentation on remote imaging for age-related macular degeneration and geographic atrophy at the International SPECTRALIS Symposium, in conversation with Hattie Hayes of Ophthalmology Times Europe
Tyson Brunstetter, OD, PhD, a US Navy Aerospace Optometrist at the NASA Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, shares key takeaways from his keynote at the International SPECTRALIS Symposium (ISS)
Rayaz Malik, MBChB, PhD, shares his presentation, titled An eye on neurodegenerative diseases: Challenging the dogma, at this year's International SPECTRALIS Symposium
At the Retina World Congress, Siegfried Priglinger, MD, speaks about ensuring the best outcomes for preschool-aged patients
At the 2025 ASCRS meeting, Robert Ang, MD said small aperture IOLs can benefit all patients, especially those with complex corneas or who have undergone previous corneal refractive surgery
Viha Vig, MBChB graduate student at the University of Auckland, New Zealand, discusses her poster presentation on the relationship between mitochondiral disease, Alzheimer disease, and other types of dementia.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.