ESCRS postoperative endophthalmitis study results minimally affect US practice patterns so far

Article

According to the results of an online survey conducted by the ASCRS Cataract Clinical Committee, the results of the ESCRS study of endophthalmitis prophylaxis do not appear to have had a significant impact on the practices of US cataract surgeons.

According to the results of an online survey conducted by the ASCRS (American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery) Cataract Clinical Committee, the results of the ESCRS (European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons) study of endophthalmitis prophylaxis do not appear to have had a significant impact on the practices of US cataract surgeons, said David F. Chang, MD, at Spotlight on Cataracts 2007.

Open to ASCRS members, the survey was performed in January 2007 and captured about 1,300 responses. The participants were predominantly US surgeons, but represented a broad distribution of surgical volumes.

Of the survey respondents, 16% said they were already using an intracameral antibiotic before the ESCRS study, but only 7% had started based on its results, whereas 77% still were not.

For surgeons using an intracameral antibiotic, vancomycin was the most frequent choice (61%). Among the non-users, the most common reason cited (89%) was a need for further study. However, 45% were concerned about risk and 17% about cost.

When asked whether they would consider an intracameral antibiotic if a product for direct injection was commercially available, 47% said yes and another 35% said they would depending upon the cost.

"One can only speculate why the ESCRS study has not had more of an impact," Dr. Chang said. "The most common practice for antibiotic prophylaxis among the survey participants involved use of a fourth-generation fluoroquinolone started 1 to 3 days preoperatively and continued immediately after surgery. In the ESCRS study, levofloxacin was used and not started until the morning after surgery.

"Therefore, the ESCRS study did not answer whether intracameral cefuroxime is as good as, better than, or useful added to the most commonly used topical antibiotic protocol in this country," he said. "The fact that 82% of respondents indicated they would at least consider using intracameral antibiotics if a product was commercially available is an important message to our partners in industry."

Related Videos
ARVO 2024: Andrew D. Pucker, OD, PhD on measuring meibomian gland morphology with increased accuracy
 Allen Ho, MD, presented a paper on the 12 month results of a mutation agnostic optogenetic programme for patients with severe vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa
Noel Brennan, MScOptom, PhD, a clinical research fellow at Johnson and Johnson
ARVO 2024: President-elect SriniVas Sadda, MD, speaks with David Hutton of Ophthalmology Times
Elias Kahan, MD, a clinical research fellow and incoming PGY1 resident at NYU
Neda Gioia, OD, sat down to discuss a poster from this year's ARVO meeting held in Seattle, Washington
Eric Donnenfeld, MD, a corneal, cataract and refractive surgeon at Ophthalmic Consultants of Connecticut, discusses his ARVO presentation with Ophthalmology Times
John D Sheppard, MD, MSc, FACs, speaks with David Hutton of Ophthalmology Times
Paul Kayne, PhD, on assessing melanocortin receptors in the ocular space
Osamah Saeedi, MD, MS, at ARVO 2024
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.